A wind signal is a wind forecast for an area, and nothing more. It does not tell you how much rain is coming, and some of the worst flooding in Philippine memory happened under low signals. Here are the five levels and their wind speeds, how they differ from rainfall warnings and storm surge advisories, and the question none of the three can answer about your address.
When a storm approaches, the number everyone repeats is the signal. Signal No. 3 sounds serious, Signal No. 1 sounds survivable. But the wind signal answers only one question, and it is probably not the question that decides whether your house floods.
Tropical cyclone wind signals are about wind, and only wind. PAGASA raises them to warn an area about expected wind speed within a stated lead time. Since the system was updated in March 2022, there are five levels:
The higher the number, the stronger the wind and the shorter the warning time, because a stronger, closer storm leaves less room to prepare.
That is the whole scope. It is a wind forecast for an area. It says nothing about how much rain will fall, and nothing about where that rain will go.
Some of the worst flooding in Philippine memory happened under low signals or no signal at all. A storm sitting offshore can pull in the southwest monsoon and dump enormous rain on land it never touches. A slow tropical depression can drop more water on a province than a fast typhoon does, because it lingers.
So the signal and the flooding come apart regularly:
If you take one thing from this: do not read the wind signal as a flood forecast. For rain, watch the separate color-coded rainfall warnings, which we covered in what a PAGASA rainfall warning means for your exact address.
It helps to keep the systems straight, because they are genuinely separate and they are issued separately:
A coastal town can be under a modest wind signal and a serious surge advisory at the same time. An inland town can be under a high wind signal with no surge concern whatsoever. Reading only the signal number collapses three questions into one, and loses the two that usually cause the damage.
All three warnings describe the storm. None of them describes your ground.
That is the gap. PAGASA can tell an entire province that 100 millimeters of rain is coming. It cannot tell you whether your particular lot is four meters above sea level next to a creek, or thirty meters up on a plateau. Those two addresses will have completely different days under the identical warning.
The ground answer is made of things that do not change between storms:
You can find all of that out on a clear day. That is the advantage: the storm warning is urgent and temporary, the ground profile is calm and permanent, and knowing the second makes the first actionable instead of just alarming.
A hazard screening is not a forecast and never will be. It cannot tell you a storm is coming, how strong it will be, or when. PAGASA does that, and during an actual event their bulletins are the authority, full stop.
What a screening does is answer the question the bulletins structurally cannot: given water arriving here, what happens? It is a screening built from national datasets, so it reads the landscape rather than your specific lot, and it does not know about a blocked canal or a neighbor who raised their ground last year. Used together, though, the two fit neatly. One tells you what is coming. The other tells you what it means where you live.
CheckHazard does not replace a professional geotechnical or engineering survey.